{"id":810,"date":"2002-02-08T16:09:00","date_gmt":"2002-02-08T12:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=810"},"modified":"2013-03-08T16:09:20","modified_gmt":"2013-03-08T12:09:20","slug":"child-bearing-in-bi-ethnik-families-resume","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=810","title":{"rendered":"CHILD-BEARING IN BI-ETHNIK FAMILIES (RESUME)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By. Lela Menabdishvili <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Childbearing has decreased twice in our country for the past ten years (1998-1999). The number of newly born children of Georgian women has decreased almost by 1,77 times in both mono-ethnic and bi-ethnic families. The number of children in bi-ethnic families has reduced, too. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>      The analysis of sociological research has showed that in many nationalities reproduction of population is better in mono-ethnic families than in bi-ethnic ones. Russian and Osetyan families constitute an exception. Different indices in bi-ethnic families are dependent on the marriage of this or that consort: wife or husband. In Georgian bi-ethnic families, childbearing is the same. The highest indices are observed in bi-ethnic marriages of Georgian men with Osetyan, Ukranian and other women. As far as population growth is concerned, two-child families are in the first place in bi-ethnic families, while one-child families hold the next place. Marriages with Osetyan women constitute an exception (two-child families -47,42%; three-child families &#8211; 24, 74%). The situation in other bi-ethnic families is as follows: childbearing is higher in bi-ethnic families of Armenian, Azerbaijanian, Kurd and Greek men than in the families of women of the same nationality.<br \/>\n      In bi-ethnic families Russian and Osetyan women have better conditions for population reproduction than men of the same nationality.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By. Lela Menabdishvili Childbearing has decreased twice in our country for the past ten years (1998-1999). The number of newly<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[26],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v15.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>CHILD-BEARING IN BI-ETHNIK FAMILIES (RESUME) - Geoeconomics<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=810\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"CHILD-BEARING IN BI-ETHNIK FAMILIES (RESUME) - Geoeconomics\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"By. Lela Menabdishvili Childbearing has decreased twice in our country for the past ten years (1998-1999). The number of newly\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\">\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\">\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Geoeconomics\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=810#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=810\",\"name\":\"CHILD-BEARING IN BI-ETHNIK FAMILIES (RESUME) - Geoeconomics\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2002-02-08T12:09:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-03-08T12:09:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c8498c0ae03a66c87b59761fbd19b04c\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=810\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c8498c0ae03a66c87b59761fbd19b04c\",\"name\":\"Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf2d8703d729f003d8905b57fcab5078?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/810"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=810"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/810\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":811,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/810\/revisions\/811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}