{"id":975,"date":"2003-03-09T11:53:21","date_gmt":"2003-03-09T07:53:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=975"},"modified":"2013-03-09T11:53:44","modified_gmt":"2013-03-09T07:53:44","slug":"the-best-seven-companies-of-insurance-sphere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=975","title":{"rendered":"THE BEST SEVEN COMPANIES OF INSURANCE SPHERE"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eka Lomidze <\/strong><\/p>\n

Social research centre “Rating Caucasus” has summarised research results regarding the seven best companies in insurance sphere. <\/p>\n

The insurance sphere turns more and more into an important financial institution. Both system and different companies are formed. It is certainly interesting how people and experts gradated insurance companies. This gradation reveals authority, management level and efficiency of advertising campaigns of these business structures as well as the whole system of public relations. Aldagi holds the first place in both versions certainly because of the company’s great experience and possibilities. “Imedi-L” holds the second place. “Britain-Caucasus” has firm positions among the leaders. The firm has lately changed content and tactics of business. The fourth place is held by “Pensions and Insurance Holding” that, to experts’ mind, can be called a very perspective enterprise.
\n As for the rest of the companies, research will describe the real picture better than our comments.
\n There are twenty-seven insurance companies in Georgia all in all.People’s choice
\n 1. Aldagi – 5904 2. Imedi-L – 4688
\n 3. Britain-Caucasus – 3916
\n 4. Pension Insurance Hoding – 2546
\n 5. Madli – 972
\n 6. NabaTi – 846
\n 7. Hellios – 240
\n Experts’ choice
\n 1. Aldagi – 675
\n 2. Imedi-L – 465
\n 3. Britain-Caucasus – 266
\n 4. Pension Insurance Hoding – 245
\n 5. NabaTi – 120
\n 6. Hellios – 54
\n 7. Madli – 32<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eka Lomidze Social research centre “Rating Caucasus” has summarised research results regarding the seven best companies in insurance sphere.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[33],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nTHE BEST SEVEN COMPANIES OF INSURANCE SPHERE - Geoeconomics<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=975\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"THE BEST SEVEN COMPANIES OF INSURANCE SPHERE - Geoeconomics\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Eka Lomidze Social research centre “Rating Caucasus” has summarised research results regarding the seven best companies in insurance sphere.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\">\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\">\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Geoeconomics\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=975#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=975\",\"name\":\"THE BEST SEVEN COMPANIES OF INSURANCE SPHERE - Geoeconomics\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2003-03-09T07:53:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-03-09T07:53:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c8498c0ae03a66c87b59761fbd19b04c\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/?p=975\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c8498c0ae03a66c87b59761fbd19b04c\",\"name\":\"Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf2d8703d729f003d8905b57fcab5078?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/975"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=975"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/975\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":976,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/975\/revisions\/976"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/geoeconomics.ge\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}