LIKE LENIN TO BOURGEOISIE

By Shota Makhatsaria

In developed countries, businessmen layer is under permanent critics of left winger media. It’s common for them who rely on postulates by communists and socialists.

If looking at our press with that sight, it will appear as the one full of red and pink colors. But deeper we look in, gaudier the colors become, acquiring the dazzling yellow at last.
For example, one the famous businesspersons had announced about his early income in an interview with journalist. Newspaper published it, but with a malicious comment: “Perhaps he had hidden something? But imagine, how immense the property is on the background of poverty throughout country?!”
Press attacks the oligarchs. It’s not new. Not long ago the Microsoft had been attacked and whole America celebrated it. “Bill deserves that”. The same category contented the president of another Bill. It’s inescapable, human always wills to see the horse rider on the ground. Probably, not quite on the ground, but too far from the supreme, closer to ordinal.
Unfortunately, they do not content with only oligarchs. This involves each of concerning persons, which are often called – speculators.
I’m aware of describing the doubtful and negative appeal of mass media to business with events of only close past, and only with atavistic psychology. One of the main reasons, to my opinion, is the fact that some presenters of Georgian mass media are completely incompetent. Unfortunately, it’s natural. Even the existing number of journalists is not enough for numerous newspapers, TV and radio established past times. Press employed the people incompetent, not prepared for work and less experienced. Take even a look at the lack of genre. Interview, Interview, and again Interview, most of media presenters can’t even write an article, feuilleton, essay? Simply – asking and answering.
Let’s take the topic, scrutinize it, and do something for solving the problem?For what and how do they do it? Editors in Chief are sure that they need sensations, intriguing headings, shrewd nicknames etc. You may have already notice the terms – “they say”, “as heard”, “according to unverified information” etc?
Another reason – more delicate and purely economic. To attack someone in another’s favour, to earn money. It’s not the secret that the pen and microphone are for sale often. Elimination of some companies does not always come out of competition. Non at all! In this case, businesspersons are more clear then presenters of the fourth government – media. Eliminating orders mostly come from policy makers, with an intention to turn economical questions into politician, which needs media of course.
Moreover, some of “researchers” are having fun so, that finally violate. Rings the telephone and phrase comes out – “Take up questions of company or business positively” – Of course, not gratis. In case of discarding, taking leaves, of one another calmly.
It’s not hard, today, to attack the person you are aiming at. Contrary to 1992-1995, when the vengeance and total uncertainty were wide spread around. We have to be proud of that press, it may looked a little bit of romantic, idealistic, but wise, uncompromising and constructive.
And one more: that’s for neither retail nor whole sale. May be, right this caused the disappearance.
Capitalism is cruel and can’t accept the idealists. At any rate, yet?